Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Another "Linux is more secure than windows" Story

Filed under
Linux
Microsoft

Software development managers rate Linux significantly higher than Windows server products for security, according to the latest research.

Over 6000 software development managers were asked in a survey conducted by BZ Media to rate the security of server operating systems against hacks and exploits. Linux was rated as 'secure' or 'very secure' by 74 percent of respondents, while Microsoft Windows Server was given one of these ratingd by 38 percent of respondents. Thirteen percent of respondents rated Linux as insecure or very insecure, a figure that rose to 58 percent for Windows server products.

A Yankee Group survey released last week found a similar, but less significant, difference between Linux and Windows server security. Yankee Group's survey asked IT executives from over 500 companies to evaluate the security of Linux and Windows on a scale of one to ten.

The respondents rated the security of Linux servers slightly higher than Windows server, with Linux scoring 8.3 out of 10 and Windows Server 2003 scoring 7.6.

Microsoft has consistently denied that Windows is less secure than Linux. It claims that Windows is more secure than open source alternatives because Microsoft fixes vulnerabilities quicker than Linux vendors are able to.

This claim is based on a Forrester report, Is Linux more secure than Windows?, which found that Microsoft had the lowest elapsed time between the disclosure of a vulnerability and the release of a fix. But the report has been criticised by Linux vendors who say it did not take into account the seriousness of the vulnerabilities.

Source.

More in Tux Machines

Announcing the Birth of Hurd

After a 25 year gestation, Hurd has finally been born. It was a difficult birth and it’s now being kept in an incubator under the care of Debian. For many years GNU’s always almost ready to be born operating system microkernel, Hurd, has been the butt of many jokes and Facebook memes, so it came as something of a surprise to read in Larry Cafiero’s Friday column that it’s now ready enough for Debian, which is offering a somewhat experimental and unstable release of Debian/GNU Hurd. An earlier attempt at a Hurd based distro, by Arch, seems to have died on the vine back in 2011, although a 2013 posting promises that development is still underway, with no news since. Read more

Arch Linux – Kde Plasma 5.3 stable is finally available for installation

Great news for Arch Linux users! From a few minutes, Kde Plasma 5.3 stable packages are officially available on Arch Linux repositories. In fact, after running the pacman -Syu command I finally noticed, listed on my terminal, the new packages of Plasma 5.3.0 with all the relative dependencies. Read more

Linux 4.1-rc2

So the -rc2's have lately been pretty small - looking more like late -rc's than early ones. It *used* to be that I couldn't even post the shortlog, because it was just too big. That's not been the case for the last few releases. I think people tend to take a breather after the merge window, because the -rc3's tend to then be a bit bigger again. But it may just also be that I've just gotten much better at saying "the merge window is over, I'm not taking random stragglers", or that people are just getting better at keeping to the merge window. Whatever the reason, the time of huge -rc2's seems to be happily behind us. Read more