Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

CentOS 6.3 – Community Choice

Filed under
Linux

CentOS is one of the more major community supported distributions of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, created from sources freely provided by the company rather than just simply respinning the distro. It’s also free for everyone, with complete compatibility with software that works on Red Hat. Even Jim Whitehurst, CEO of Red Hat, fully supports the creation and maintaining of CentOS, saying he prefers it to Oracle Linux.

As well as a selection of security updates, 6.3 adds new and better tools to aid in the moving of systems (both physical and virtual) to a KVM virtual machine, and has switched to LibreOffice as the main office suite for the distribution. Otherwise there’s not a whole lot new –

rest here




More in Tux Machines

Debian-Based Distribution Updated With KDE 3.5 Forked Desktop

Q4OS 1.2 "Orion" is the new release that is re-based on Debian Jessie, focused on shipping its own desktop utilities and customizations, and designed to run on both old and new hardware. Read more

Atom Shell is now Electron

Atom Shell is now called Electron. You can learn more about Electron and what people are building with it at its new home electron.atom.io. Read more Also: C++ Daddy Bjarne Stroustrup outlines directions for v17

A Fedora 22 beta walk-through

The new Fedora, with its GNOME 3.16 interface, is an interesting, powerful Linux desktop. Read more Also: Web software center for Fedora Red Hat's Cross-Selling and Product Development Will Power Long-Term Growth Red Hat Updates Open Source Developer and Admin Tools

Unix and Personal Computers: Reinterpreting the Origins of Linux

So, to sum up: What Linus Torvalds, along with plenty of other hackers in the 1980s and early 1990s, wanted was a Unix-like operating system that was free to use on the affordable personal computers they owned. Access to source code was not the issue, because that was already available—through platforms such as Minix or, if they really had cash to shell out, by obtaining a source license for AT&T Unix. Therefore, the notion that early Linux programmers were motivated primarily by the ideology that software source code should be open because that is a better way to write it, or because it is simply the right thing to do, is false. Read more Also: Anti-Systemd People