some leftovers:

- Ranking Linux distributions, and the decline of the traditional distros
- New Security Feature in Fedora 19 Part 3: Hard Link/Soft Link Protection
- Open-source office suite written in Java
- Updated history of the 2.6.16-stable kernel
- Pidora 18 (Raspberry Pi Fedora Remix) Release
- From subversive to mainstream: Looking back on 18 years
- Rktcr coming soon to Linux, demo out now!
- BSD Magazine (May 2013): Jails Firewall with PF
- SELinux policy for incron: what does it do?
- The Luminosity of Free Software, Episode 13
- Microsoft releases Skype for Linux 4.2
- Synaptic update error in Debian Jessie
- Designing Electronics with Linux
- FLOSS Weekly 252
- Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
- Megabyte punch from Electro Games Will be on Linux also
- vnstat: Network logging over time
- The Cheapskate's Corner
- Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 released
- Debian Project mourns the loss of Ray Dassen
-
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version
- 1055 reads
PDF version
More in Tux Machines
- Highlights
- Front Page
- Latest Headlines
- Archive
- Recent comments
- All-Time Popular Stories
- Hot Topics
- New Members
Cloud Foundry (LF) News
| ‘No Company Is So Important Its Existence Justifies Setting Up a Police State’
You’re talking about very — about specific manifestations, and in some cases in ways that presuppose a weak solution.
What is data privacy? The term implies that if a company collects data about you, it should somehow protect that data. But I don’t think that’s the issue. I think the problem is that it collects data about you period. We shouldn’t let them do that.
I won’t let them collect data about me. I refuse to use the ones that would know who I am. There are unfortunately some areas where I can’t avoid that. I can’t avoid even for a domestic flight giving the information of who I am. That’s wrong. You shouldn’t have to identify yourself if you’re not crossing a border and having your passport checked.
With prescriptions, pharmacies sell the information about who gets what sort of prescription. There are companies that find this out about people. But they don’t get much of a chance to show me ads because I don’t use any sites in a way that lets them know who I am and show ads accordingly.
So I think the problem is fundamental. Companies are collecting data about people. We shouldn’t let them do that. The data that is collected will be abused. That’s not an absolute certainty, but it’s a practical, extreme likelihood, which is enough to make collection a problem.
A database about people can be misused in four ways. First, the organization that collects the data can misuse the data. Second, rogue employees can misuse the data. Third, unrelated parties can steal the data and misuse it. That happens frequently, too. And fourth, the state can collect the data and do really horrible things with it, like put people in prison camps. Which is what happened famously in World War II in the United States. And the data can also enable, as it did in World War II, Nazis to find Jews to kill.
In China, for example, any data can be misused horribly. But in the U.S. also, you’re looking at a CIA torturer being nominated to head the CIA, and we can’t assume that she will be rejected. So when you put this together with the state spying that Snowden told us about, and with the Patriot Act that allows the FBI to take almost any database of personal data without even talking to a court. And what you see is, for companies to have data about you is dangerous.
And I’m not interested in discussing the privacy policies that these companies have. First of all, privacy policies are written so that they appear to promise you some sort of respect for privacy, while in fact having such loopholes that the company can do anything at all. But second, the privacy policy of the company doesn’t do anything to stop the FBI from taking all that data every week. Anytime anybody starts collecting some data, if the FBI thinks it’s interesting, it will grab that data.
And we also know that the FBI and other such agencies are inclined to label protesters as terrorists. So that way they can use laws that were ostensibly adopted to protect us from terrorists to threaten a much larger number of us than any terrorist could.
|
Today in Techrights
| Android Leftovers
|
Recent comments
18 min 9 sec ago
18 hours 57 min ago
19 hours 37 min ago
1 day 23 hours ago
3 days 4 hours ago
4 days 11 hours ago
5 days 20 hours ago
1 week 3 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 2 days ago