Canonical Explains Why Linux Mint and All Other Distros Must Sign a License Agreement

Filed under
Linux

Canonical has issued an official explanation for the reason why Linux Mint developers have to sign a license agreement in order to continue to distribute the package straight from the Ubuntu repos.

Read more ►

ubuntu

I understand restricting redistribution of copyrighted branding/artwork but restricting distribution of non branded software is a violation of the GPL, correct?

I can't way for some GNU folk to make a website called boycottbUbuntu.org Tongue

GNU/FSF

This has already been done to some degree. In the wake of privacy abuses in Ubuntu (with CIA's special partner Amazon) I had discussions with RMS about it and in December 2012 I helped draft what RMS now references when he speaks about Ubuntu:

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.html

There have been issues other than that, but I am still happy when I hear about people moving to Ubuntu. It's much better than using proprietary software.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.