Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

CA cities try again for M$ damages

Filed under
Microsoft
Legal

The cities and counties of San Francisco and Los Angeles, as well as the counties of Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Contra Costa, are expected to amend their complaint, which sought damages on behalf of all other California government agencies on claims that Microsoft overcharged them for its software.

The original lawsuit was dismissed by Judge Frederick Motz after he ruled that government agencies are barred from filing suit under California's Unfair Competition Law, UCL, and that the four-year limitation period included in both the Cartwright Act and the UCL had expired. The government agencies were seeking damages for the period covering February 18, 1995, to the present day.

"The countless civil cases that have been filed against Microsoft since Judge Jackson issued his [November 1999] findings of fact and conclusions of law demonstrate that there was no practical impediment preventing plaintiffs from instituting this action long ago," wrote Judge Motz.

The judge did give the cities and counties leave to amend their complaint under the Cartwright Act for damages they claim to have suffered within four years of filing the complaint, however.

In 2003, Microsoft settled a separate class action with California businesses and consumers for $1.1bn, although government agencies were excluded from the settlement under the terms finally approved by San Francisco's Superior Court in July 2004.

Source.

More in Tux Machines

This Week in Techrights

Open source licensing: What every technologist should know

If you’re a software developer today, you know how to use open source software, but do you know how and why open source licensing started? A little background will help you understand how and why the licenses work the way they do. Read more

Kali Linux 2017.2 Release

We are happy to announce the release of Kali Linux 2017.2, available now for your downloading pleasure. This release is a roll-up of all updates and fixes since our 2017.1 release in April. In tangible terms, if you were to install Kali from your 2017.1 ISO, after logging in to the desktop and running ‘apt update && apt full-upgrade’, you would be faced with something similiar to this daunting message: Read more Also: Kali Linux 2017.2 Released With New Hacking Tools — Download ISO And Torrent Files Here

Open source-based business lessons from a seasoned CEO

The default now is to build from open and in the open. So that's a positive. The downside is that by open source being the default, we may be getting a little lazy. If you remember back 5-10 years, open sourcing was a big deal, and it forced a level of rigor that may have led, in some cases, to founders and early investors taking better approaches to building their company—for example, shifting towards SaaS wherever possible, in part because of the ability to demonstrate clear value versus their own open source. Read more