Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Site news - keepin' ya posted

Filed under
Site News

If you've noticed the lack of reviews and slower than usual performance of tuxmachines, there is a good reason. I'm working on an off-site hosting vps in hopes of moving tuxmachines to a faster server and/or larger pipe.

Not that I've entirely neglected my reviewing interests, as Sunday I did test 3 distros. I afraid I didn't have much luck. Two of them were from Distrowatch's waiting list and didn't complete the boot (or into gui) process and the other was DSL 2.4.

DSL 2.4 was released and I wanted to write an article on it, except after booting I found all improvements were under the hood. I just couldn't get a full length article out of it. So, I ended up scraping that idea.

But back to the new server. I've rented a vps from tektonic and started with a debian 3.1 install. It was a fairly easy dist-upgrade to etch and moving my site was a no-brainer as well.

I had tried a vps out of Europe last month, I forget the name right now, but ssh response time was agonizing slow and whenever I tried to import drupal's database - mysql would disconnect. They didn't answer my email about it, so I'm test driving tektonic right now.

So far tektonic seems fine except it's slow for me. I've had a few friends from around the world test it and I am getting some positive feedback. So hopefully, it'll just be slow for me. Big Grin

I've been uploading my site which consists of about 1.5 gigs of data. This has been eating up some of my already limited bandwidth making tuxmachines even slower than normal. But hopefully most of the uploading will be finished in a few hours and I will only need to get a newer snapshot of the database when the time comes for further testing.

I will be soliciting testers and opinions in a few days on the speed of the new site. We might experience a bit of bumpy road if we decide to move there permanently with dns and such, but hopefully it will end up providing a more pleasant experience for my regulars and be able to handle more traffic if needed.

Thanks.

Oh, ps.: A monthly printed Linux publication asked for permission to re-print my SUSE article in their magazine with a link to the site, so hopefully that'll bring in some new visitors as well. I hope we complete the move before it's published! Big Grin

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Questions on bandwidth, operating system and tectonic hardwa

atang1 wrote:

It seems about the same speed when guests approach 150 on any bandwidth? Guests around 60 is plenty fast.

Well, I'd hoped a bigger pipe wouldn't bog down as soon as mine seems to when a story hits the "big" sites. I don't know how it's gonna work out, nor do I know the norm. This will be my first attempt at using a hosting service. There are fast drupal sites out there - it must be possible. Big Grin

atang1 wrote:

Is the operating system finetuned to their server cpu(platform)?

Naw, I don't think so. Like I said, our started out a Debian 3.1. It's built for like 386s ain't it?

I'm not a big Debian expert, but my other choices were centos, fedora 4, or suse 10.0. I figured debian to be my best bet for server. I love Gentoo, but it's inconvenient for a server.

Re: Tectonic people must be able to advise you ?

atang1 wrote:

I noticed you do not yet have a batch processing cron job established between the two repositories. I think you only have to have minutes delay until it gets really busy to have within seconds any accuracy?

This experience may give us some idea if it is indeed bandwidth or operating system slow down?

Well, if you mean rsync'in between them, then nope. I looked into it and html files would be easy enough. a php database is another subject altogether. I first toyed with the idea of "load balancing" between the two, but there is no good way I've found to updated one database from the other. Unless you know of a good way?

I mean I could have one use the database of the other, but I think that would slow things down more than it'd help. WDYT?

More in Tux Machines

6 big changes coming to Fedora 22

Hold on to your (red) hats. Fedora 22, the next iteration of the "move fast and break things" version of Linux sponsored by Red Hat, is set to arrive on May 19. After the multiple editions introduced in the previous Fedora, what's in store this time? The answer lies with the proposals received by the Fedora Engineering and Steering Committee (FESCo), whose deadline for proposed changes passed last week. Here are some of the more notable and head-turning proposals for Fedora 22 that seem most likely to make it to the final product. Read more

Sorry, Windows 10 Fans, but This Is What Icons Should Look Like

The icon theme of an operating system has more importance than people might imagine. Microsoft has updated the icons for the latest Windows 10 preview and they actually look terrible and they lack consistency. We listed a few Linux ones for a better comparison. Read more

Canonical Reveals the Hardware Specs of the Ubuntu Aquarius E4.5 Phone

In the meantime, even if Meizu was the first company to confirm the release of an Ubuntu phone, it looks like Bq beat them to the punch, although they are aiming at different users. The specs detailed by Canonical show that Aquarius E4.5 is an affordable device with medium hardware specs. It doesn't seem like much, but it's addressed at people who don't want to spend too much on a high-end phone, but still want to own a smartphone. Read more

Scalable open virtual networking with MidoNet

Networking is an important part of any modern datacenter. As open source continues to grow in virtualization solutions, virtualized networking is an important part of the picture. MidoNet, an open source network virtualization platform for Infrastructure-as-a-serivice (IaaS) clouds like OpenStack cloud software, is gaining traction as a way to implement networking solutions. Read more