Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Kubuntu 6.06

Filed under
Linux
Reviews
-s

With all the Ubuntu excitement passed few days it occurred to me that being a KDE fan moreso than gnome, perhaps Kubuntu might be more my cup of tea. When perusing the downloads it also occurred to me that 'hey I have a 64bit machine now!' So, I downloaded the Kubutu 6.06 desktop amd64 iso. Was it more appealing to a diehard KDE fan? Does 64bit programming make much difference?

The boot is similar to Ubuntu's, in fact it's almost identical except for the more attractive blue coloring and instead of the Ubuntu goldish logo we have the blue kubuntu. Otherwise there didn't seem to be much difference until we reached the splash screen. As attractive as Ubuntu's gui splash might be, kubuntu's is much more so. It's clean and crisp, and I just personally prefer blue.

        

Once you reach the desktop, one finds a blue background that looks like large faint bubbles as a foundation for KDE 3.5.2. It is your basic KDE desktop consisting of kapps for most popular tasks. What's not included on in the iso is installable. Included graphics are Kooka, krita, kpdf, and gwenview. For Internet we find akregator, bluetooth chat, Konqueror, Konversation, kopete, Kppp, krdc, drfb, ktorrent and a wireless lan manager. Multimedia includes amaroK, K3b, Kaffeine, KAudioCreator, kmix, and KsCD.

        

OpenOffice.org 2.02 rounds up the office category as well as KDE deciding kontact is an office application. There are plenty of system tools and utilities as well. There are utils for software packaging, setting alarms, configuring groupware connections, managing your printing jobs, and calculating. System tools consists of Kcron, Keep, KInfocenter, KSysGuard, KSystemLog, Konsole and QTParted.

        

On the desktop as well as in the System menu is an icon for Install. Installing to the harddrive is simplified over comparable Linux system, and in this case it is very similar if not identical to the process found in Ubuntu. It starts with answering a few configuration questions such as language, timezone, keyboard, and user and machine name.

        

Next comes partitioning if necessary and setting the target partition and swap. Confirm settings and press Install. All one does now is wait. It takes about 10 minutes for the installer to complete it's work before asking if you'd like to reboot. That's it.

        

Like Ubuntu, the installer presumes you would like grub installed so doesn't bother to ask and my first install attempt wasn't successful. The newly installed system would not boot. It just sat at the 'loading grub' screen blinking at me, in much the same manner as I encountered with the Ubuntu release candidate. After replacing grub with lilo, kubuntu tried to boot, but lots of things failed including the loading of needed modules and the start of the gui. I booted the livecd and tried again, this time doing nothing else in the background and achieved a bootable install. The first time I was taking a bunch of screenshots. I think I'm beginning to see a pattern emerge here in all my installs of the Ubuntu family and can sum it up in a few words of advice. Do not do anything else while your new Ubuntu system installs. This of course detracts from the main advantage of using a livecd as an install medium, but on the other hand, it takes such a short span of time to install that it's not a major sacrifice.

The installed system affords one the opportunity to install whatever applications one might need as well any 3rd party or proprietary drivers. (k)ubuntu software is installed thru an app called adept. Not only is it an software manager, but it also takes care of system or security updates. In fact one of the first thing I saw when I booted Kubuntu the first time was an icon in the System tray for adept and clicking on it brought up an updater. Click to fetch list of updates and in a few seconds it will inform you if anything needs updating. In this case there were updates to the adept software manager and gnome install data. One can Apply Updates or Forget Changes and Quit. I clicked Apply Changes and the updates were downloaded and installed in seconds without issue.

        

In the menu is an entry for Adept which opens a window similar to Synaptic. You can search for specific packages by keywork with tickable options, and right click package name to "Request Install." Then click on the Apply Changes button and your package as well as dependencies are downloaded and installed.

        

Clicking on "Add and Remove Programs" also brings up adept, but in a different layout. In this layout one finds the applications available or installed listed by category. Ticking the little checkbox and clicking Apply Changes will install or remove chosen programs.

        

The hardware detection was good and pretty much everything worked out of the box. Kaffeine was able to play mpgs and the example files but not avis. OpenOffice crashed and disappeared my first attempt at using it, but functioned properly in all subsequent tests. The KDE that was included was a bit stripped down and included no games at all, but lots of choices are available through the software manager. The desktop itself was pretty even if customized very little. Under the hood is a 2.6.15 kernel, Xorg 7.0 and gcc 4.0.3 is installable.

The performance of the system was well above average. In fact, I'll just say it, that thing flies. Applications opened up before I could move my mouse. There was no artifacting or delay in redrawing windows, no delay at all in switching between windows, or "jerkiness" when moving windows around. The menu popped right open without delay as well. The whole system felt light and nimble. I was quite impressed. Comparing the performance of kde kubuntu to gnome ubuntu is almost like comparing peaches to nectarines and since I didn't test the x86 version of kubuntu, I can't say with any authority or expertise that kubuntu 64 out-performs the others. But I can say this is one of the, if not the, fastest full-sized systems I've tested. Yes sir, kubuntu was quite impressive.

Kubuntu 6.06 Review

Thanks for your review.
Just a few personal comments about this new release.

FIRST, THE BAD . . .

1) Yes, I profoundly dislike NOT being able to log in as root. Granted, I don't spend much time logged-in as user root, but when I'm going to do an extended session of system configuration and maintenance, it's the fastest, most efficient way. And, of course, Linux is supposed to be about choice.

So I googled "Kubuntu root login", and got to a Kubuntu forum where some user had asked the same question. In the forum, the next person had posted in reply (I'm paraphrasing here): I know how to enable root logins for Kubuntu, but I'm not going to tell you how because this is not a good idea.

I just couldn't believe my eyes. OSS is all about freedom and the ability to control your own machine. "THERE'S NO INFORMATION HIDING IN LINUX!!!" (Imagine Tom Hanks in the movie, A League of Their Own saying "There's no crying in baseball!")

As I sat there thinking about this, I began to think that these Ubuntu/Kubuntu folk are a different kind of folk than me--alien, strange, ungracious, and infuriating. All that wondering about the popularity of Ubuntu/Kubuntu increased. Why would anyone want to use a distro where a simple request for information was received with such an ignorant, uptight, shortsighted, narrowminded, hypocritical, and outright anal response?

Working myself up to a good simmer, now, I then look at the next post in the forum, where a user quietly and considerately told exactly how to do it. OK, maybe these Kubuntu folk aren't jerks. Too much rush to judgement and stereotyping going on in our world anyway.

2) I'm not too familiar with Debian, or Debian based distros--so this one is probably my fault. I couldn't get Nvidia's accelerated drivers working properly. I have an older 17" LCD monitor that still works great, but it's very fussy about sync rates. I can usually tinker around and get things working, but no go here. I admit I was impatient here, and if I'd spent more time, I could have gotten it to work.

3) Development compilers and libraries are not included with the basic live CD install. There is such a thing as designing a distro for beginners, but not treating them like idiots. Can't find a package for your distro that works? Then, you can get the source and compile your own. Basic tools to do this, in my opinion, should always be included with the basic install of a Linux distro.

NOW, THE GOOD.

1) I like the graphical package installer, Adept. It works well, and is well designed and integrated.

2) Despite the heavy load the Ubuntu/Kubuntu servers must have been undergoing with a new release, they were quick and responsive.

3) I agree with every thing srlinux had to say in her (typically excellent) review, particularly when she says Kubuntu is very fast and responsive. I installed the amd64 version, and speed was excellent.

4) Kubuntu very courteously found all the other distros on my hard disks, and added them to the Grub boot menu. If all distros would do this, installing and trying out multiple distros would certainly be easier.

Well, that's it. I think it might be interesting to see an in-depth comparison of the latest Mepis(ver. 6, rc4) to this new Kubuntu release.

Gary Frankenbery

re: Kubuntu 6.06 Review

gfranken wrote:

Thanks for your review.
Just a few personal comments about this new release.

FIRST, THE BAD . . .

1) Yes, I profoundly dislike NOT being able to log in as root. Granted, I don't spend much time logged-in as user root, but when I'm going to do an extended session of system configuration and maintenance, it's the fastest, most efficient way. And, of course, Linux is supposed to be about choice.

Yeah, I didn't like that one too much, especially when the ubuntus hit the pipes. I'm used to it now I guess and it only annoys me slightly when I forget to sudo a command. I found just setting a root password will fix that tho.

teehee on the tom hanks thing. Big Grin

gfranken wrote:

3) Development compilers and libraries are not included with the basic live CD install. There is such a thing as designing a distro for beginners, but not treating them like idiots. Can't find a package for your distro that works? Then, you can get the source and compile your own. Basic tools to do this, in my opinion, should always be included with the basic install of a Linux distro.

Yeah, that used to really urk me too. But like the sudo thing, I'm getting used to it. I'm seeing it more and more in distros these days. A comment on another site said to install the build-essentials to get gcc, make, and friends. It was nice seeing that comment before my installs that way I didn't have to get all annoyed at it. Big Grin

Thanks for your kind words for me, I really appreciate that.

----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?

It's not as bad as it looks

1) Yes, I profoundly dislike NOT being able to log in as root.

I must admit that I created a root password on the first machines where I installed Ubuntu. (sudo passwd) But now I just let the root user blocked and use (sudo su) to get a shell that has root rights and exit it again after some system maintenance. It is possible more secure that script kiddies cannot login as root via ssh (not standard installed but the first thing I usually install) even if they try really hard.

2) I couldn't get Nvidia's accelerated drivers working properly.

After installing the nvidia package (apt-get install nvidia-glx) I usually run the reconfiguration of xorg by (dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg) this creates a new /etc/X11/xorg.conf file including sync ranges. This tool always shows the options chosen the last time it has run so it is easy to use multiple times to tweak things.

3) Development compilers and libraries are not included with the basic live CD install.

It is easy to correct (apt-get install build-essential) but many people don't need those tools. The current repositories are packed with all kind of usefull software. It is very seldom that I revert to debian-unstable to get sources of something and repack it to create an ubuntu version of the same project.

Re: It's not as bad as it looks

Quote:
After installing the nvidia package (apt-get install nvidia-glx) I usually run the reconfiguration of xorg by (dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg) this creates a new /etc/X11/xorg.conf file including sync ranges. This tool always shows the options chosen the last time it has run so it is easy to use multiple times to tweak things.
Thanks Jurgen, for taking the time to explain the nvidia thing. My weakness when configuring Debian based distros is definitely showing here.

Also thanks for your clarification on installing the development packages.

Kubuntu is definitely on my radar. It was certainly blazingly fast.

Regards,
Gary Frankenbery
Computer Science Teacher
Grants Pass High School, Oregon, USA

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Distros: Draco in Sparky, Fedora Issues and Optional Dependencies in Debian

  • Draco Desktop
    There is a new desktop available for Sparkers: Draco
  • Archiving 26 500 community Q&As from Ask Fedora
    Ask Fedora is the Fedora Linux community’s questions-and-answers portal, and it recently transitioned from a forum software called Askbot to Discourse. Changing the underlying forum software doesn’t have to be destructive but Ask Fedora decided to go with a nuke-and-pave migration strategy: They decided to start from scratch instead of copying user accounts and the user-contributed content to the new software. The first time I learned of the migration was a few days after it had happen. I’d run into an issue with my Fedora installation and went online looking for solutions. Every useful search result was from the old Ask Fedora site and every link returned an HTTP 404 Not Found error message as those answers hadn’t been migrated to the new Ask Fedora website.
  • Attention epel6 and epel7 ppc64 users
    If you are a epel6 or epel7 user on the ppc64 platform, I have some sad news for you. If you aren’t feel free to read on for a tale of eol architectures. ppc64 (the big endian version of power) was shipped with RHEL6 and RHEL7 and Fedora until Fedora 28. It’s been replaced by the ppc64le (little endian) version in Fedora and RHEL8.
  • Optional dependencies don’t work
    In the i3 projects, we have always tried hard to avoid optional dependencies. There are a number of reasons behind it, and as I have recently encountered some of the downsides of optional dependencies firsthand, I summarized my thoughts in this article. [...] Software is usually not built by end users, but by packagers, at least when we are talking about Open Source. Hence, end users don’t see the knob for the optional dependency, they are just presented with the fait accompli: their version of the software behaves differently than other versions of the same software. Depending on the kind of software, this situation can be made obvious to the user: for example, if the optional dependency is needed to print documents, the program can produce an appropriate error message when the user tries to print a document. Sometimes, this isn’t possible: when i3 introduced an optional dependency on cairo and pangocairo, the behavior itself (rendering window titles) worked in all configurations, but non-ASCII characters might break depending on whether i3 was compiled with cairo. For users, it is frustrating to only discover in conversation that a program has a feature that the user is interested in, but it’s not available on their computer. For support, this situation can be hard to detect, and even harder to resolve to the user’s satisfaction.

Servers: Kubernetes, Microservices, Containers and SUSE's Enterprise Storage 6

  • Is bare Kubernetes still too messy for enterprises?
    Kubernetes is touted as a computing cure-all, fixing up multicloud networking to data mobility. The open-source platform for orchestrating containers (a virtualized method for running distributed applications) may or may not be the panacea it’s hyped up to be. What is certain is that user-ready Kubernetes isn’t as easy as it sounds, so customers should shop carefully for a provider. Enterprise users of Kubernetes and containers may not guess just how many moving parts are under the covers. There are a ton of tiny pieces that have to line up just so in order for them to work, according to Mark Shuttleworth (pictured), founder and chief executive officer of Canonical Ltd. He likens these technologies to carefully constructed “fictions.”
  • Data as a microservice: Distributed data-focused integration
    Microservices is the architecture design favored in new software projects; however, getting the most from this type of approach requires overcoming several previous requirements. As the evolution from a monolithic to a distributed system takes place not only in the application space but also at the data store, managing your data becomes one of the hardest challenges. This article examines some of the considerations for implementing data as a service.
  • Container Adoption Shoots Up Among Enterprises In 2019: Survey
    Majority of IT professionals now run container technologies, with 90 percent of those running in production and 7 in 10 running at least 40 percent of their application portfolio in containers — an impressive increase from two years ago, when just 67 percent of teams were running container technologies in production. According to the joint 2019 Annual Container Adoption Survey released by Portworx and Aqua Security, enterprises have started making bigger investments in containers. In 2019, nearly one in five organizations is found to be spending over $1 million annually on containers (17%) as compared to just four percent in 2016.
  • SUSE Rolls Out Enterprise Storage 6
    SUSE has announced the latest version of its software-defined storage solution powered by Ceph technology. With SUSE Enterprise Storage 6, IT organizations can adapt to changing business demands. They may also reduce IT operational expense with new features focused on containerized and cloud workload support, improved integration with public cloud, and enhanced data protection capabilities, SUSE said.

OSS: 3scale, Wikipedia Edit-a-thon, LibreOffice Conference 2020, DataStax Openwashing and IGEL

  • Red Hat completes open sourcing of 3scale code
    At Red Hat we have always been proud of our open source heritage and commitment. We are delighted that more of the industry now shares our viewpoint, and more companies are looking to promote their open source bona fides of late. Open source software energizes developers and teams of committed developers working in parallel can outproduce the large development hierarchies of the last generation. We believe working upstream with open source communities is an important innovation strategy. Occasionally, however, innovation does originate in traditional commercial organizations under a proprietary development model. Three years ago, Red Hat discovered just such a company that was doing exciting things in the API economy.
  • Enbies and women in FOSS Wikipedia edit-a-thon
    To be brief, I’ll be hosting a Wikipedia edit-a-thon on enbies and women in free and open source software, on June 2nd, from 16:00 – 19:00 EDT. I’d love remote participants, but if you’re in the Boston area you are more than welcome over to my place for pancakes and collaboration times.
  • LibreOffice Conference 2020, it could be in your city
    LibreOffice Conference 2020 will be an event to remember, for a couple of reasons: it will be the 10th of a series of successful conferences, and it will celebrate the 10th anniversary of the LibreOffice project and the 20th of the FOSS office suite. In 2020, The Document Foundation will be on stage at many FOSS events around the world, and the LibreOffice Conference will be the most important of the year. Organizing this conference is a unique opportunity for FOSS communities, because the event will make the history of free open source software.
  • DataStax and the Modern Commercial Open Source Business
    One month ago, Google announced a set of partnerships with seven commercial open source providers. Among those announced was DataStax, which held its annual conference this year and, for the first time, an analyst day. While DataStax and the open source project it is based on, Cassandra, are differentiated on a technical basis, the company also represents an interesting contrast with its peers directionally both among the newly minted Google partners and more broadly. Of the seven commercial open source partners Google announced, for example, DataStax is one of two along with InfluxData that has not introduced a non-open source, hybrid license as a means of protecting itself from competition from the cloud providers. This is not, notably, because the company doesn’t seem them as a threat; asked about who the competition was in the analyst sessions, the CEO of DataStax candidly acknowledged that the company’s primary competitive focus was not on premise competition such as Oracle, but cloud-based managed services offerings.
  • IGEL Developing Linux Distro For Windows Virtual Desktop Users [Ed: IGEL used to support #GNU/Linux and now it's just helping Microsoft enslave GNU/Linux insider Windows with NSA back doors.]

Linux Mint Turns Cinnamon Experience Bittersweet

Linux Mint no longer may be an ideal choice for above-par performance out of the box, but it still can serve diehard users well with the right amount of post-installation tinkering. The Linux Mint distro clearly is the gold standard for measuring Cinnamon desktop integration. Linux Mint's developers turned the GNOME desktop alternative into one of the best Linux desktop choices. Linux Mint Cinnamon, however, may have lost some of its fresh minty flavor. The gold standard for version 19.1 Tessa seems to be a bit tarnished when compared to some other distros offering a Cinnamon environment. Given that the current Linux Mint version was released at the end of last December, it may be a bit odd for me to focus on a review some five months later. Linux Mint is my primary driver, though, so at long last I am getting around to sharing my lukewarm experiences. I have run Linux Mint Cinnamon on three primary work and testing computers since parting company with Ubuntu Linux Unity and several other Ubuntu flavors many years ago. I have recommended Linux Mint enthusiastically to associates and readers in my personal and professional roles. Read more