Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Mark Shuttleworth's Morality, More And More Questioned

Filed under
Ubuntu

This is not funny, to be deceived by someone who is regarded with a religious devotion by some. When comes to Mark Shuttleworth, it seems I'm not the only one questioning his real moral probity.

To make the point on what was written on this blog about Mr. Shuttleworth:

David Barth about Ubuntu in Mandriva Linux Inside #1: «I've learnt to be cautious with people throwing piles of money with no apparent goals

When Canonical Lies (through omission, in part): Canonical can't prove the statement «The Ubuntu server platform has been certified for IBM's DB2 and MySQL», as the only certified product (at the time of the statement) was Ubuntu 5.04, "validated for DB2 v8.2" and no more. "Ubuntu server" first appeared with version 5.10.

Full Story.

questionable

Sound a little questionable. I don't use Ubuntu because it contains only open source software - I use it because it is easy to install, has a lot of open source software that it has easily installable and has the latest versions and it is stable, efficient, and mostly bug free. If another distribution can do that well or better, I will seriously consider that one. But until then, I am very happy with the latest Ubuntu whether they use proprietary components are not. It would be nice if they were more transparent about it.

Boo Hoo

I always judge companies by what their competitors say, because you just know they will have the most honest and factual opinions.

If Ubuntu and Shuttleworth offends your moral compass, choose another distro. There's only about 9 zillion distros these days, certainly one must be run by nuns and magic elves that won't offend your moral sensitivities.

It's a sad world where people will bitch about a free lunch - perhaps you'd feel better buying a $600 SCO Linux License?

Shuttleworth

Perhaps we have a Gates= DOS, Shuttleworth = Linux scenario in the making . Does Bill care we think he is an asshole ?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Firefox OS media-casting stick strikes Kickstarter gold

The first Firefox OS based media player has arrived on Kickstarter, in the form of a $25 open-spec HDMI stick that supports Chromecast-like content casting. The Matchstick, which has already zoomed past its Kickstarter campaign’s $100,000 funding goal, with 28 days still remaining, was teased back in June by Mozilla developer evangelist Christian Heilmann. The unnamed prototype was billed as an open source HDMI stick that runs Mozilla’s Linux-based Firefox OS and offers casting capabilities. Few details were revealed at the time except that the device used the same DIAL (DIscovery And Launch) media-casting protocol created by Netflix and popularized by Google’s Chromecast. Read more

Open source history, present day, and licensing

Looking at open source softwares particularly, this is a fact that is probably useful to you if you are thinking about business models, many people don't care about it anymore. We talk about FOSS, Free and Open Source Software, but if we really are strict there's a difference between free software and open source software. On the left, I have free software which most typically is GPL software. Software where the license insures freedom. It gives freedoms to you as a user, but it also requires that the freedoms are maintained. On the right-hand side, you have open source software which is open for all, but it also allows you to close it. So here we come back to the famous clause of the GPL license, the reciprocity requirement which says, "If I am open, you need to be open." So software that comes under the GPL license carries with it something that other people call a virus. I call it a blessing because I think it's great if all software becomes open. Read more

Leftovers: Software

Proprietary

today's howtos