Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Mark Shuttleworth's Morality, More And More Questioned

Filed under
Ubuntu

This is not funny, to be deceived by someone who is regarded with a religious devotion by some. When comes to Mark Shuttleworth, it seems I'm not the only one questioning his real moral probity.

To make the point on what was written on this blog about Mr. Shuttleworth:

David Barth about Ubuntu in Mandriva Linux Inside #1: «I've learnt to be cautious with people throwing piles of money with no apparent goals

When Canonical Lies (through omission, in part): Canonical can't prove the statement «The Ubuntu server platform has been certified for IBM's DB2 and MySQL», as the only certified product (at the time of the statement) was Ubuntu 5.04, "validated for DB2 v8.2" and no more. "Ubuntu server" first appeared with version 5.10.

Full Story.

questionable

Sound a little questionable. I don't use Ubuntu because it contains only open source software - I use it because it is easy to install, has a lot of open source software that it has easily installable and has the latest versions and it is stable, efficient, and mostly bug free. If another distribution can do that well or better, I will seriously consider that one. But until then, I am very happy with the latest Ubuntu whether they use proprietary components are not. It would be nice if they were more transparent about it.

Boo Hoo

I always judge companies by what their competitors say, because you just know they will have the most honest and factual opinions.

If Ubuntu and Shuttleworth offends your moral compass, choose another distro. There's only about 9 zillion distros these days, certainly one must be run by nuns and magic elves that won't offend your moral sensitivities.

It's a sad world where people will bitch about a free lunch - perhaps you'd feel better buying a $600 SCO Linux License?

Shuttleworth

Perhaps we have a Gates= DOS, Shuttleworth = Linux scenario in the making . Does Bill care we think he is an asshole ?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Terminal app appears in Chome OS Dev, hints at future Linux application support

Back in February, some commits to the Chromium codebase revealed that Chrome OS would soon run Linux applications using a container. While it has been possible for years to run Linux applications on top of Chrome OS using crouton, it's a hacky solution that only works in Developer Mode. Google's solution would presumably work better, and perhaps not require Dev Mode to be enabled. Read more

​What's the most popular Linux of them all?

Let's cut to the chase. Android is the most popular of all Linux distributions. Period. End of statement. But that's not the entire story. Still it must be said, according to StatCounter, Android is the most popular of all operating systems. By a score of 39.49 percent to 36.63 percent, Android beats out Windows for global personal device supremacy. Sorry Windows, you had a nice run, but between your smartphone failures and the PC decline, your day is done. But, setting Android aside, what's the most popular Linux? It's impossible to work that out. The website-based analysis tools, such as those used by StatCounter, NetMarketShare, and the Federal government's Digital Analytics Program (DAP), can't tell the difference between Fedora, openSUSE, and Ubuntu. DAP does give one insightful measurement the others sites don't give us. While not nearly as popular as Android, Chrome OS is more popular than all the other Linux-based desktops combined by a score, in April 2018, of 1.3 percent to 0.6 percent of end users. Read more

Android/ChromeOS/Google Leftovers

Games: SC-Controller 0.4.2, Campo Santo, Last Epoch and More