Will Vista need Sp3 to be stable and bug free, sort of?

Linux distros are inmature?

No one bothered to lock down with a final version and auto-update for five years. New functions do not need a new version? will Ubuntu make the fatal mistake of not locking down the 6.06 version? New Unbuntu versions are propping up like popcorn. It will not survive, when new versions distract the continued use of v6.06. 300 bug fixes and no sp1 announced yet for people to upgrade. You have to work hard to become a Linux expert to keep up, if you decided to use Ubuntu 6.06.

All Linux distro made mistake thinking that new version number in the open sourced community means bugs are fixed. On the contrary, most bug fixing lead to new bugs. Functions had to be locked down to have bugs fixed. Stand alone applets can be upgraded if kernels are locked down. One variable has to be stable, for other variables to be changed to the better.

Linux kernels had to be official, so KDE and Gnome can be stable from distro to distro. RedHat changes in 2.6.17.2137 means they will have prblems keeping up with 2.6.20.xxxx? Usually it takes 2.6.32.xxxx to be stable like sp1 at Microsoft. The attempt to change the foundation on which a large house is built, can only bring chaos. why make more work for yourselves to change Linux kernels, just compile what you needed; put all the functions in the control center for applications?

When you choose Linux distro, look for official Linux kernels, that kde and gnome can be made stable. Look for a browser that codecs can be added. and cookies directory will be compatible to IE6.0/7.0. Without cookies, you can not logon to the important websites such as banks online. Linspire already repackaged their Firefox to be able to login to banks online? Check out all the distros and see which one can logon to banks?