Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Screenshots of Flock

Filed under
Software
-s

I've posted some screenshots of Flock 0.4.9 in the gallery if anyone is interested. It is said to be based upon Mozilla and it's quite evident by looking. Althought I have noticed a few additional features and a really cool theme (icons, progress bar, etc), it basically looks like firefox.

There's that cool "star" feature which appears to be a one click bookmarking tool. It has a choice of search engins in the toolbar, chosen from a dropdown list. It has a rssview, that shows what a rss supported site looks like perhaps as a rss feed. I noticed flickr and del.ico.us extentions in the configuration. Some other early extentions include enhanced google search and adblock (although instead of installing it, it downloaded and rendered the code in a broswer window). One of the nicest features is the "Create a blog post" option. From there one enters their url and the post, and Flock will upload it. However it won't work on Tuxmachines because I disabled that option for security reasons. The fonts look good as well.

I've not been using it too long, but it seems stable so far. I uploaded those screenshots with it and I am now posting with it as well. These are usually pretty good tests for a browser. Big Grin So, although to me it looks like a mozilla/firefox clone, I've read there's quite a bit of original work under the hood. All in all, it seems fairly neato at this point.

Screenshots in the gallery.

Nice Browser

I've been playing with this browser all evening and it is pretty slick. I'm going to rpm it for the pclinuxos users to install from Synaptic.

re: Nice browser

Yeah, I'm really liking it. I like firefox but primarily use konqueror. But I really like the way sites render in Flock. I love the fonts. I changed them slightly in the preferences to get the look I want, but they render really well. I've played around some more with it and put up a few more shots. One of the nicest things I've noticed so far is that after installing an plugin, it becomes available immediately. It doesn't require a restart like many other browsers. The more I use it, the better I like it. Smile

----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?

Tested

I tested some of the plugins such as flash and some foxnews videos and the plugins seem to work quite well.

re: tested

Yep! I made me a menu entry and replaced one of the three konqueror icons on my desktop (one was an empty browser, the other two open at specific sites) with one for flock. Point being: I rarely go to that trouble for any app, so I must be impressed.

Of course I guess you do this automagically in PCLOS. Big Grin

----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?

Yes

The pclos rpm I added to synaptic automatically puts Flock in the menu and I worked up a post script to check for existing plugins and to symlink them into the flock plugin folder so they are avaliable to flock when the browser is launched.

It's a snap with Synaptic

LOL, no sooner had I downloaded and installed the source for Flock, then I just happen to be in Synaptic looking for updates and behold there's Flock! Thanks Texstar for keeping PCLinuxOS on the cutting edge!

Much obliged!

Bring me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses, yearning to free themselves from the shackles of mindless desktop experiences

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more

10 Reasons to use open source software defined networking

Software-defined networking (SDN) is emerging as one of the fastest growing segments of open source software (OSS), which in itself is now firmly entrenched in the enterprise IT world. SDN simplifies IT network configuration and management by decoupling control from the physical network infrastructure. Read more

Only FOSSers ‘Get’ FOSS

Back on the first of September I wrote an article about Android, in which I pointed out that Google’s mobile operating system seems to be primarily designed to help sell things. This eventually led to a discussion thread on a subreddit devoted to Android. Needless to say, the fanbois and fangrrls over on Reddit didn’t cotton to my criticism and they devoted a lot of space complaining about how the article was poorly written. Read more